Skip to content

Compare / Named

Rheono vs MindFort: flat per surface, or credits that scale with depth

Verdict

Rheono wins when you want one published price per surface and want the tests run against the live app from outside, without a repo. MindFort wins when you want the fix written for you and can live with metered credits. €99 a month is one full pentest; €499 is continuous.

What MindFort is

MindFort sells agent swarms that attack a live application, prove each finding with a working exploit, open a patch pull request, and retest after the fix. It states a false-positive rate below 1% and a time to verified findings under 8 hours, and it says source code is optional.

Its pricing is published and metered. Starter starts at $499 a month with 250 credits and one concurrent assessment; Scale starts at $999 with 800 credits and five. Depth costs credits: 200 for a balanced run, 400 deep, 800 ultra. Retests and patch PRs draw from the same pool, and overage bills at once.

Two claims matter to this comparison. Agents complete authenticator-app, SMS and email MFA themselves, and dual-credential mode stores two accounts to test cross-tenant access. Its FAQ states the only human decision is merging the fix.

What MindFort does better

MFA without a human. MindFort's agents complete TOTP, SMS and email MFA on their own. At Rheono, email verification is agent-handled and hard second factors still raise a takeover request for a person.

The fix, written. MindFort opens a patch pull request and retests after deployment. Rheono reports and retests; it does not write the patch.

A published false-positive number. MindFort states under 1%. Rheono scores false positives in its eval harness, but does not publish a live rate yet.

More targets per plan. Scale carries unlimited targets for $999. Rheono's Growth covers a single surface.

Where Rheono differs

Cost does not rise with depth. MindFort meters: a deep run costs 400 credits and an ultra run 800, and both retests and patches spend from the same pool. Rheono's price is flat per surface, and depth is not a meter. A month of daily deep runs on Growth costs the same as one.

No repo needed, ever. Source is optional at MindFort but the patch PR needs a repo. Rheono's pentest never needs one at all.

Scope in writing before the first request. You prove you own the domain with a DNS TXT record or a well-known file, then sign an authorization with rules of engagement: hosts, techniques, rate limits, no-gos and a contact. It is valid for 90 days, and the agents only talk to the hosts it names.

Three checks behind every finding. The agent that finds a flaw proves it once. A separate validator, which never saw that work, tries to break the proof in its own session, and a scripted replay reruns the exploit where the bug class allows. The signatory reviews the result and signs the report with an advanced electronic signature, with NIS2 / ISO 27001-ready evidence mapping. The sample report shows one finding end to end.

A European vendor. Rheono is run from Germany, stores customer data in the EU, signs a DPA under Art. 28 GDPR and bills in euros.

Side-by-side

DimensionRheonoMindFort
What you buy[1]A pentest of one live web app and its APIAgent-swarm assessments with patch PRs and retests
Starting point[1]The running app and API, with your test accountsYour live application; source code optional
Published price[2]€99/month (Starter), €499/month (Growth), flat per surfaceFrom $499/month with 250 credits (Starter); from $999/month with 800 (Scale); Enterprise custom
How depth is priced[2]Flat. More depth or more precision does not raise the billCredits per run: 200 balanced, 400 deep, 800 ultra; retests and patches spend the same pool
MFA[2]Email verification by the agent; hard second factors raise a takeover requestTOTP, SMS and email MFA completed by the agents
Fix written for you[1]No, the report is yours to act onYes, a patch pull request against the branch you choose
Published false-positive rate[1]Not published yet; scored in the eval harnessUnder 1%, stated on the homepage
Scope[1]Written, signed authorization; agents only touch the named hostsScope defined in the platform
Vendor base[1]Germany, EU data, DPA, eurosUnited States

We only state what we can source. For MindFort's current offer and prices, see their site.

Read this page if

You are choosing between two continuous agents and have no appetite for a credit meter on security testing.

Go to MindFort instead if

You want the fix opened as a pull request and your agents to clear second factors alone.

FAQ

Is Rheono cheaper than MindFort?
On daily use, yes, because rheono does not meter depth. MindFort's Starter is $499 a month for 250 credits, and a single ultra assessment costs 800, three times the monthly allowance.
Does Rheono complete second-factor challenges?
Email verification is handled by the agent. A hard second factor raises a takeover request to a person, who clears it and hands the run back.
Does Rheono write the fix?
No. Every finding carries a working exploit and a reproduction, and there is a retest after you fix it. The patch itself is yours.
Does Rheono need a repo?
No. The pentest runs against the live app and API from outside. Repo access is only for the optional code-assisted add-on.
What does Rheono need before the first pentest?
Proof that you own the domain (a DNS TXT record or a well-known file), a signed authorization with rules of engagement, and test accounts if the agents should test behind the login.

Sources

Facts about other companies come from these pages, read on the date shown. Prices and plans change; check the page before you buy.

  1. [1]MindFort, homepage · read 2026-11-01
  2. [2]MindFort, pricing and plans · read 2026-11-01

More comparisons

Next step

Published tiers on pricing. Prefer a lower-risk first look? Run the free read-only check.

Competitor names are used for honest comparison. No invented list prices, logos-as-customers, or testimonials.

PostHog analytics (EU), only if you agree. Privacy