Compare / Category
PTaaS vs one-off AI pentest
Verdict
Rheono wins when you want PTaaS economics — continuous coverage on a published flat subscription so shipping more often does not reopen procurement.
Side-by-side
| Dimension | Rheono PTaaS | One-off AI pentest |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial model | Self-serve subscription tiers (Starter → Business) | Per-project or credit packs; often quote-gated |
| Between engagements | Overwatch continues; intensive hunt after your go | Coverage stops when the engagement ends |
| Retests | Included in the standing loop | Often billed or ticketed separately |
| Procurement | Checkout → domain verify → authorize → hunt | SOW / credits / schedule per run |
Who Rheono is for
Teams that want continuous PTaaS with a known monthly cost and do not want to reopen a statement of work every release.
FAQ
- Is Starter continuous?
- Starter is one deep hunt per month on one app. Growth and above are continuous (intensive after release + overwatch). See /pricing.
- Can I buy a one-off from Rheono?
- Published primary door is subscription. Enterprise / custom paths are email — one-off audits are not the public primary offer.
Next step
Published tiers on pricing. Prefer a lower-risk first look? Run the free read-only check.
Competitor names are used for honest comparison. No invented list prices, logos-as-customers, or testimonials.