Skip to content

Compare / Category

Autonomous pentest vs vulnerability scanner

Verdict

Rheono wins when you need proof of exploit (reproducible PoCs and a signed evidence report), not another alert flood.

Side-by-side

DimensionRheono (autonomous pentest)Vulnerability scanner
OutputValidated findings with working PoCsAlerts, CVE lists, often high false-positive volume
PositioningPenetration test on web/APIAsset inventory + known-vuln matching / DAST scan
Compliance evidenceSigned report with NIS2 / ISO mapping per findingScan export / dashboard, rarely auditor-ready alone
Pricing feelFlat on every tier; on Growth and above, more pentests do not raise the billOften per asset, scan credit, or enterprise seat

Who Rheono is for

Teams that already tried scanners and still need findings proven before engineering queues them, plus signed evidence for customers or NIS2 conversations.

FAQ

Is Rheono a scanner?
No. Rheono is continuous autonomous penetration testing: agents try the exploit inside written scope, a validator tries to break it, only findings with a working PoC are reported, and Rheono signs the report.
Will I still get noise?
Every finding passes a validation gate before it is reported. You get proof, not an unfiltered alert stream.

More comparisons

Next step

Published tiers on pricing. Prefer a lower-risk first look? Run the free read-only check.

Competitor names are used for honest comparison. No invented list prices, logos-as-customers, or testimonials.

PostHog analytics (EU), only if you agree. Privacy