product · code review

Every PR reviewed.
Before it merges.

The agents read every diff with full codebase context: data flows, missing auth checks, framework misconfigs. A named researcher verifies. Finding = file:line + PoC — not scanner output.

  • Every PR and merge request
  • Full codebase context, not just the diff
  • Findings close when the fix merges

How the review runs

01

Repo access

GitHub or GitLab. The agents index the code, build call graphs, read the logic.

02

Every PR reviewed

Data flows, missing auth checks, race conditions, payment & checkout. Finding with file:line + PoC, inline in the PR.

03

Tuning

Triage comments and rules for the parts only your team knows. Fewer false positives after every review.

One review for all of application security

Business logic
Injection: SQL, XSS, SSRF, XXE
Prompt injection
Memory safety
AuthN & authz
Infrastructure as code
Supply chain
Secrets

A general AI reviewer lets an authorization bug ship.

General AI reviewer
  • Style, naming, patterns
  • Lists what might be there
  • You triage every flag yourself
Rheono review
  • Exploitability, with a data-flow trace
  • PoC per finding, in the PR
  • Business impact, named and prioritized

Pricing

Part of the standing hunt: +€5,000/yr, flat. On the deep audit: +€1,500, one-off. In writing before we start.

How is this different from SAST?+

SAST matches known rules and lists. We check exploitability: authz flaws that map to no rule, with a data-flow trace and a PoC.

Which platforms?+

GitHub and GitLab. Findings land as PR comments, fixes as branches.

What happens to our code?+

Repo access and data handling are written into the contract. Details: Trust & security.

Put us on the next pull request.

Repo access, first reviews, then flat. Or start with the free check.

Trust & security