Compare / Category
Autonomous pentest vs vulnerability scanner
Verdict
Rheono wins when you need proof of exploit — reproducible PoCs and a signed evidence report — not another alert flood.
Side-by-side
| Dimension | Rheono (autonomous pentest) | Vulnerability scanner |
|---|---|---|
| Output | Gate-passed findings with working PoCs | Alerts, CVE lists, often high false-positive volume |
| Positioning | Penetration-test style hunt on web/API | Asset inventory + known-vuln matching / DAST scan |
| Compliance evidence | Signed report with NIS2 / ISO mapping per finding | Scan export / dashboard — rarely auditor-ready alone |
| Pricing feel | Flat SaaS; scan volume does not spike the bill | Often per asset, scan credit, or enterprise seat |
Who Rheono is for
Teams that already tried scanners and still need findings proven before engineering queues them — plus signed evidence for customers or NIS2 conversations.
FAQ
- Is Rheono a scanner?
- No. Rheono is continuous autonomous penetration testing: agents hunt, validators prove, a named pipeline signs the report. We do not position as a vulnerability-scanner brand.
- Will I still get noise?
- Every finding passes a validation gate before it is reported. That is the product promise — proof, not an unfiltered alert stream.
Next step
Published tiers on pricing. Prefer a lower-risk first look? Run the free read-only check.
Competitor names are used for honest comparison. No invented list prices, logos-as-customers, or testimonials.